Loading…

Schasel v. . International Railway Company — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Schasel v. . International Railway Company

1920 N.Y. LEXIS 588 · New York Court of Appeals · Nov 16, 1920

Full text

Charles Schasel, Appellant, v. International Railway Company, Respondent

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion. Concur: Hiscock, Ch. J., Collin, McLaughlin, Andrews and Elkus, JJ. Dissenting: Hogan and Pound, JJ.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Not listed
Cluster ID: 3611687

Citations

1920 N.Y. LEXIS 588
230 N.Y. 538
130 N.E. 884

Cited by

Wall v. International Railway Co.
New York Court of Appeals · Apr 25, 1922
Wall v. International Railway Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Mar 9, 1921

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service