Loading…

Krauskopf v. . Tallman — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Krauskopf v. . Tallman

170 N.Y. 561 · New York Court of Appeals · Feb 11, 1902

Full text

Nathan Krauskopf, Appellant, v. Clarence E. Tallman, Respondent

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion. Concur: Bartlett, Haight, Martin, Yann, Cullen and Werner, JJ. Absent: Parker, Ch. J.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Not listed
Cluster ID: 3611889

Citations

170 N.Y. 561
1902 N.Y. LEXIS 1089
62 N.E. 1096

Cited by

Ford v. State
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Jun 23, 1964
People v. Dobler
New York County Courts · May 16, 1961
Bienenstock v. McCoy
New York Supreme Court · Apr 7, 1949

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service