Loading…

Taylor v. . Hotchkiss — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Taylor v. . Hotchkiss

1904 N.Y. LEXIS 1186 · New York Court of Appeals · Aug 5, 1904

Full text

George M. Taylor, Respondent, v. Horace L. Hotchkiss Et Al., as Surviving Partners of the Firm of Horace L. Hotchkiss & Company, Appellants

Judgment affirmed, with costs; nó opinion. Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Gray, Bartlett, Martin, Vann, Cullen and Werner, JJ.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Not listed
Cluster ID: 3615091

Citations

1904 N.Y. LEXIS 1186
179 N.Y. 546
71 N.E. 1142

Cited by

In re the Accounting of Lessord
New York Surrogate's Court · Dec 8, 1950
Straus v. Cunningham
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Dec 31, 1913

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service