Loading…

Derlicka v. Leo — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Derlicka v. Leo

284 N.Y. 711 · New York Court of Appeals · Nov 26, 1940

Full text

Mary Derlicka Et Al., Appellants, v. Samuel Leo, Respondent, Impleaded With Others

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion. Concur: Lehman, Ch. J., Loughran, Finch, Rippey, Sears, Lewis and Conway, JJ.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Not listed
Cluster ID: 3616278

Citations

284 N.Y. 711
1940 N.Y. LEXIS 1324
31 N.E.2d 47

Cited by

Borgia v. City of New York
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Jun 4, 1962
Kaplan v. State
New York State Court of Claims · Mar 20, 1950
Merkle v. County of Nassau
New York Supreme Court · Feb 28, 1950
Rudolph v. City of New York
New York Supreme Court · Dec 31, 1947
Reeder v. Board of Education
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Nov 30, 1942
Derlicka v. Leo
New York Court of Appeals · Jan 16, 1941

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service