Loading…

Brintnall v. . Rice — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Brintnall v. . Rice

1903 N.Y. LEXIS 1244 · New York Court of Appeals · Jan 30, 1903

Full text

Norman Y. Brintnall, Respondent, v. Samuel M. Rice, Appellant

Judgment affirmed, with costs ; no opinion. Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Gray, Bartlett, Haight, Martin, Vann and Werner, JJ.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Not listed
Cluster ID: 3616299

Citations

1903 N.Y. LEXIS 1244
173 N.Y. 618
66 N.E. 1105

Cited by

Benedict v. Slocum
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Jul 1, 1904

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service