Loading…

Spickerman v. . McChesney — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Spickerman v. . McChesney

20 N.Y. St. Rep. 79 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 11, 1888

Full text

John Spickerman, Respondent, v. Adam McChesney, as Executor, Etc., Appellant

Opinions in this case

Majority — Danforth
Majority — Danforth

Danforth, J., reads for affirmance. All concur. Judgment affirmed.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author: Danforth
Judges: Danforth
Cluster ID: 3617732

Citations

20 N.Y. St. Rep. 79
2 Silv. Ct. App. 131
111 N.Y. 686
1888 N.Y. LEXIS 1068
19 N.E. 266

Cited by

Griggs v. Day
New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1897
Brumfield v.Hill
New York Supreme Court · Dec 7, 1889

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service