Loading…

Dintruff v. . Rochester City and Brighton Railroad Co. — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Dintruff v. . Rochester City and Brighton Railroad Co.

1891 N.Y. LEXIS 1433 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 3, 1891

Full text

George Dintruff, an Infant by Guardian, Etc., Respondent, v. the Rochester City and Brighton Railroad Company, Appellant

Agree to affirm ; no opinion. All concur. Judgment affirmed.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Not listed
Cluster ID: 3618560

Citations

1891 N.Y. LEXIS 1433
124 N.Y. 647
26 N.E. 950

Cited by

Jackson v. Union Ry. Co. of New York City
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Dec 5, 1902
Davis v. Marvine
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Dec 2, 1896
Barrett v. New York Cent. & H. R. Railroad
New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1895

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service