Loading…

Fitzhugh v. . Sackett — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Fitzhugh v. . Sackett

50 N.Y. 699 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 24, 1872

Full text

Daniel Fitzhugh Et Al., Respondents, v. William H. Sackett, Appellant

Per Curiam. Opinion for affirmance All concur, except Church, Ch. J., dissenting. Judgment affirmed.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Per Curiam
Cluster ID: 3618702

Citations

50 N.Y. 699
1872 N.Y. LEXIS 526

Cited by

Abraham v. American Exchange National Bank
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Apr 30, 1920
Van Campen v. Bruns
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Jul 1, 1900
Ahern v. . Goodspeed
New York Court of Appeals · Jan 15, 1878

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service