Loading…

Dougherty v. . Rome, Watertown and Ogdensburgh Rd. Co. — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Dougherty v. . Rome, Watertown and Ogdensburgh Rd. Co.

1893 N.Y. LEXIS 925 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 6, 1893

Full text

James Dougherty, Respondent, v. the Rome, Watertown and Ogdensburgh Railroad Company, Appellant

Agree to affirm; no opinion. All concur. Judgment affirmed.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Not listed
Cluster ID: 3621136

Citations

1893 N.Y. LEXIS 925
138 N.Y. 641
34 N.E. 512

Cited by

Peterson v. Eighmie
New York Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1916

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service