Loading…

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Holman v. . Patten

227 N.Y. 623 · New York Court of Appeals · Nov 25, 1919

Full text

William Holman, Appellant, v. Walter R. Patten, Respondent

Motion for re-argument denied, with ten dollars costs and necessary printing disbursements. (See 227 N. Y. 22.)

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Not listed
Cluster ID: 3621643

Citations

227 N.Y. 623
1919 N.Y. LEXIS 795
125 N.E. 919

Cited by

No cited-by records returned.

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service

Holman v. . Patten — freecase.ai