Loading…

Schuck v. Kings Realty Company — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Schuck v. Kings Realty Company

1941 N.Y. LEXIS 1740 · New York Court of Appeals · Apr 24, 1941

Full text

Amelia Schuck, Appellant, v. Kings Realty Company, Respondent, Impleaded With Others

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion. Concur: Loughran, Finch, Rippey, Lewis, Conway and Desmond, JJ. Taking no part: Lehman, Ch. J.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Not listed
Cluster ID: 3621954

Citations

1941 N.Y. LEXIS 1740
285 N.Y. 750
34 N.E.2d 907

Cited by

Dime Savings Bank v. Levy
New York Supreme Court · May 24, 1994
Less v. Associated Planning Group, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · May 23, 1994
Dominion Financial Corp. v. 275 Washington Street Corp.
New York Supreme Court · Nov 27, 1970

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service