Loading…

McKenna v. . Bolger — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

McKenna v. . Bolger

27 N.Y. St. Rep. 980 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 10, 1889

Full text

Mary L. McKenna, as Temporary Administratrix, Etc., Respondent, v. Thomas Bolger, Appellant

Opinions in this case

Majority
Majority

Agree to affirm; no opinion. All concur, except Peckham, J., not sitting. Judgment affirmed.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Not listed
Cluster ID: 3622291

Citations

27 N.Y. St. Rep. 980
117 N.Y. 651
1889 N.Y. LEXIS 1525
22 N.E. 1132

Cited by

Werring v. Selig
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Apr 25, 1934
Royall v. Holloway
Texas Supreme Court · Nov 30, 1927

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service