Loading…

Hausauer v. . Dahlman — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Hausauer v. . Dahlman

1900 N.Y. LEXIS 1131 · New York Court of Appeals · May 15, 1900

Full text

Charles A. Hausauer Et Al., Respondents, v. Sarah Dahlman Et Al., Appellants

•Judgment affirmed, with costs, on opinion below. Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Gray, Bartlett, Martin,Vann, Cullen and Werner, JJ.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Not listed
Cluster ID: 3622602

Citations

1900 N.Y. LEXIS 1131
163 N.Y. 567
57 N.E. 1125

Cited by

Feig v. Hart
City of New York Municipal Court · Jan 21, 1931

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service