Loading…

Martindale v. De Kay — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Martindale v. De Kay

224 N.Y. 585 · New York Court of Appeals · Jul 12, 1918

Full text

Joseph B. Martindale Et Al., as Receivers of Mills & Gibb, Appellants, v. Charles De Kay, Respondent

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion. Concur: Hiscock, Ch. J., Chase, Collin, Cuddeback, Hogan, Cardozo and McLaughlin, JJ.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Not listed
Cluster ID: 3624798

Citations

224 N.Y. 585
1918 N.Y. LEXIS 973
120 N.E. 869

Cited by

Pearl-Wick Corp. v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance (In Re Pearl-Wick Corp.)
S.D. New York · Feb 22, 1982
Pink v. Meyer
New York Supreme Court · Feb 13, 1936
Gaylord v. Anderson
New York Supreme Court · Dec 28, 1925
Martindale v. Evans
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Jun 16, 1922

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service