Loading…

Crossin v. . Woolf — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Crossin v. . Woolf

1917 N.Y. LEXIS 1035 · New York Court of Appeals · Jan 30, 1917

Full text

Anna R. Crossin, Respondent, v. James A. Woolf Et Al., Defendants, and Ralph A. Stemm, Appellant

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion. Concur: Hiscook, Ch. J., Chase, Collin, Cuddebaok, Hogan, Cardozo and Pound, JJ.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Not listed
Cluster ID: 3624999

Citations

1917 N.Y. LEXIS 1035
220 N.Y. 586
115 N.E. 1036

Cited by

Crossin v. Woolf
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Apr 5, 1918

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service