Loading…

Matter of Smith v. . O.M. Osterheld Son — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Matter of Smith v. . O.M. Osterheld Son

1920 N.Y. LEXIS 723 · New York Court of Appeals · May 4, 1920

Full text

In the Matter of the Claim of Emma Smith, Respondent, Against O. M. Osterheld & Son Et Al., Appellants. State Industrial Commission, Respondent

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion. Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Chase, Hogan, Caedozo, McLaughlin, Crane and Elkus, JJ.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Not listed
Cluster ID: 3629226

Citations

1920 N.Y. LEXIS 723
229 N.Y. 525
129 N.E. 901

Cited by

In re the Claim of Vincent
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Jan 4, 1928
Claim of Norris v. New York Central Railroad
New York Court of Appeals · Nov 22, 1927

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service