Loading…

Rudiger v. . Coleman — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Rudiger v. . Coleman

200 N.Y. 536 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 13, 1910

Full text

Eugene A. Rudiger Et Al., Appellants, v. James S. Coleman Et Al., Respondents

Motion for re-argument, or to amend remittitur, denied, with ten dollars costs. (See 199 N. Y. 312.).

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Not listed
Cluster ID: 3629565

Citations

200 N.Y. 536
1910 N.Y. LEXIS 1500
93 N.E. 498

Cited by

No cited-by records returned.

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service