Loading…

Goodwin v. . Lamport Holt, Ltd. — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Goodwin v. . Lamport Holt, Ltd.

236 N.Y. 570 · New York Court of Appeals · May 29, 1923

Full text

Constance Goodwin, as Administratrix of the Estate of Alexander Goodwin, Deceased, Appellant, v. Lamport & Holt, Ltd., Et Al., Respondents

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion. Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Hogan, Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin and Andrews, JJ. Dissenting: Crane, J.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Hogan, Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin, Andrews, Crane
Cluster ID: 3632862

Citations

236 N.Y. 570
1923 N.Y. LEXIS 997
142 N.E. 287

Cited by

Palm v. New York, N. H. & H. R. Co.
Second Circuit · Nov 17, 1952

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service