Loading…

Haag v. . Hillemeier — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Haag v. . Hillemeier

120 N.Y. 651 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 3, 1890

Full text

Jacob Haag Et Al., Respondents, v. Charles Hillemeier, Appellant

Follett, Ch. J., reads for affirmance. All concur. Judgment affirmed.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author: Follett
Judges: Follett
Cluster ID: 3636323

Citations

120 N.Y. 651
75 Sickels 651
1890 N.Y. LEXIS 1346
24 N.E. 807

Cited by

Pulaski Hall Ass'n v. American Surety Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota · Oct 24, 1913

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service