Loading…

Peabody v. Interborough Rapid Transit Company — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Peabody v. Interborough Rapid Transit Company

240 N.Y. 708 · New York Court of Appeals · Jul 15, 1925

Full text

Nina H. Peabody, Respondent, v. Interborough Rapid Transit Company, Appellant

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion. Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Cardozo, McLaughlin, Crane, Andrews and Lehman, JJ. Absent: Pound, J.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Not listed
Cluster ID: 3640685

Citations

240 N.Y. 708
1925 N.Y. LEXIS 955
148 N.E. 768

Cited by

Johnson v. Western Union Telegraph Co.
New York Court of Appeals · Oct 12, 1944
Western Union Tel. Co. v. Commissioner of Int. Rev.
Second Circuit · Dec 18, 1933
Western Union Tel. Co. v. Commissioner
Board of Tax Appeals · Dec 8, 1932
Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Commissioner
Board of Tax Appeals · Dec 8, 1932
Gold & Stock Tel. Co. v. Commissioner
Board of Tax Appeals · Aug 31, 1932
Gold & Stock Telegraph Co. v. Commissioner
Board of Tax Appeals · Aug 31, 1932
United States v. Western Union Telegraph Co.
Second Circuit · Jun 1, 1931
United States v. Western Union Telegraph Co.
S.D. New York · Dec 24, 1926

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service