Loading…

Kueckel v. . Ryder — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Kueckel v. . Ryder

1902 N.Y. LEXIS 1091 · New York Court of Appeals · Feb 11, 1902

Full text

Frank Kueckel, Appellant, v. Edgar S. Ryder Et Al., Respondents

Judgment affirmed, with costs, on opinion below. Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Bartlett, Haight, Martin, Vann, Cullen and Werner, JJ.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Not listed
Cluster ID: 3641784

Citations

1902 N.Y. LEXIS 1091
170 N.Y. 562
62 N.E. 1100

Cited by

Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Donaldson
Alabama Court of Appeals · Apr 3, 1934
Garlinger v. Linwood Construction Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Jun 29, 1923
Woodcock v. Sartle
New York Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1914
Hopkins v. Empire Engineering Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Sep 11, 1912

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service