Loading…

Pachter v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Pachter v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc

594 F.2d 852 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 11, 1978

Full text

Pachter v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc

594 F.2d 852 Pachter v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. No. 78-7297 United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit 12/11/78 E.D.N.Y., 444 F.Supp. 417 AFFIRMED

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Not listed
Cluster ID: 364266

Citations

594 F.2d 852
1978 U.S. App. LEXIS 7140

Cited by

Raymond L. Dirks v. Securities and Exchange Commission
D.C. Circuit · May 18, 1982

Parentheticals

a broker who had heard rumors of fraud at Equity Funding did not have a duty to disclose them to a client who submitted an unsolicited “buy” order on the morning of March 27
Raymond L. Dirks v. Securities and Exchange Commission

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service