Loading…

De Raismes v. Thomas — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

De Raismes v. Thomas

261 N.Y. 696 · New York Court of Appeals · Apr 18, 1933

Full text

Francis E. De Raismes, Respondent, v. Harold L. R. Thomas Et Al., Appellants

Motion to amend remittitur denied, with ten dollars costs and necessary printing disbursements. (See 260 N. Y. 272, 698.)

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Not listed
Cluster ID: 3643997

Citations

261 N.Y. 696
1933 N.Y. LEXIS 1508
185 N.E. 797

Cited by

No cited-by records returned.

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service