Loading…

Matter of Bailey v. Rutherford — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Matter of Bailey v. Rutherford

243 N.Y. 591 · New York Court of Appeals · Sep 28, 1926

Full text

In the Matter of Theodorus Bailey, Respondent, v. Robbins S. Rutherford, Appellant

Motion to amend remittitur denied, without costs. (See 242 N. Y. 220, 570.)

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Not listed
Cluster ID: 3645953

Citations

243 N.Y. 591
1926 N.Y. LEXIS 868
154 N.E. 618

Cited by

No cited-by records returned.

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service