Loading…

Solarz v. . Manhattan Railway Company — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Solarz v. . Manhattan Railway Company

155 N.Y. 645 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 1, 1898

Full text

Anthony Solarz, Respondent, v. the Manhattan Railway Company, Appellant

Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur, except Gray, J., absent.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Not listed
Cluster ID: 3645970

Citations

155 N.Y. 645
1898 N.Y. LEXIS 956
49 N.E. 1105

Cited by

Talge Mahogany Co. v. Hockett
Indiana Court of Appeals · Jan 6, 1914
Brady v. City of New York
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Mar 15, 1912

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service