Loading…

Ehrlich v. Jack Mills, Inc. — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Ehrlich v. Jack Mills, Inc.

248 N.Y. 598 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 12, 1928

Full text

Sam Ehrlich, Appellant, v. Jack Mills, Inc., Respondent

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion. Concur: Cardozo, Ch. J., Pound, Crane, Andrews, Lehman, Kellogg and O’Brien, JJ.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Not listed
Cluster ID: 3647121

Citations

248 N.Y. 598
1928 N.Y. LEXIS 1412
162 N.E. 539

Cited by

April Productions, Inc. v. G. Schirmer, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Jun 8, 1954
In re the General Assignment for the Benefit of Creditors of Film Classics, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Nov 7, 1951

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service