Loading…

Hayman v. . Canton Art Metal Company — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Hayman v. . Canton Art Metal Company

1919 N.Y. LEXIS 1170 · New York Court of Appeals · Jan 7, 1919

Full text

Oscar M. Hayman Et Al., Appellants, v. Canton Art Metal Company, Respondent

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion. Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Chase, Cuddeback and McLaughlin, JJ. Dissenting: Collin, Hogan and Crane, JJ.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Not listed
Cluster ID: 3648897

Citations

1919 N.Y. LEXIS 1170
225 N.Y. 643
121 N.E. 872

Cited by

Barber-Greene Co. v. M. F. Dollard, Jr., Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Jan 19, 1934

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service