Loading…

Mattocks v. Daylin, Inc — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Mattocks v. Daylin, Inc

614 F.2d 770 · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · Nov 21, 1979

Full text

Mattocks v. Daylin, Inc

614 F.2d 770 Mattocks v. Daylin, Inc. No. 79-1354 United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit 11/21/79 W.D.Pa., 452 F.Supp. 512 AFFIRMED

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Not listed
Cluster ID: 374155

Citations

614 F.2d 770

Cited by

Sears, Roebuck and Co., a New York Corporation v. Reliance Insurance Company, a Pennsylvania Corporation, Sears, Roebuck and Co., a New York Corporation v. Commercial Union Insurance Company, a Massachusetts Corporation and Reliance Insurance Company, a Pennsylvania Corporation
Seventh Circuit · Jul 21, 1981
Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Reliance Insurance
Seventh Circuit · Jul 21, 1981
Kelmo Enterprises, Inc. v. Commercial Union Insurance
Superior Court of Pennsylvania · May 6, 1981

Parentheticals

"(o)nly those claims clearly not covered by the policy are excluded from the duty to defend"
Sears, Roebuck and Co., a New York Corporation v. Reliance Insurance Company, a Pennsylvania Corporation, Sears, Roebuck and Co., a New York Corporation v. Commercial Union Insurance Company, a Massachusetts Corporation and Reliance Insurance Company, a Pennsylvania Corporation
“[o]nly those claims clearly not covered by the policy are excluded from the duty to defend”
Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Reliance Insurance

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service