Clark v. N.C. Department of Correction

*********** On April 16, 2008, plaintiff filed an affidavit on a Form T-1 Claim for Damages Under the Tort Claims Act alleging that an employee of defendant acted with deliberate indifference to his medical situation by refusing to provide plaintiff with access to his breathing machine and other medical treatment and for using verbally abusive language. N.C. Gen. Stat. § 143-291(a) confers the Industrial Commission with jurisdiction to hear claims of negligence against the State Board of Education, the Board of Transportation, and all other departments, institutions and agencies of the State. Intentional acts are not within the scope of the Tort Claims Act. N.C. Gen. Stat. § 143-291. Under the North Carolina Tort Claims Act, the North Carolina Industrial Commission does not have jurisdiction to adjudicate matters of intentional torts.Frazier v. Murray, 135 N.C. App. 43, 519 S.E.2d 525 (1999). As plaintiff alleges intentional acts on the part of defendant, the Industrial Commission lacks jurisdiction *Page 2 over plaintiff's claim. N.C. Gen. Stat. § 143-291(a); Guthrie v. StatePorts Authority, 307 N.C. 522, 299 S.E.2d 618 (1983). Therefore, plaintiff's claim is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. No costs are taxed as plaintiff was permitted to file this civil action in forma pauperis. This the 25th day of March, 2009. S/_____________ STACI T. MEYER COMMISSIONER CONCURRING: S/_____________ PAMELA T. YOUNG CHAIR S/_____________ DANNY L. MCDONALD COMMISSIONER *Page 1