Wiley Ex'r. v. . Wiley and Others

Reade, J. The scope of the bill is to have a decree to ■enable the plaintiff, as executor, to sell the real estate to pay ■•debts, the personal estate being, as is suggested, exhausted. There are several reasons why the plaintiff should not have -the relief which he seeks. 1. It is not alleged in the bill that the personal estate is exhausted. The allegation is, that he made “ two sales of perishable property; such as was not embraced in the bequests to the widow.” There was considerable personal property bequeathed to the widow, which was subject to sale to pay debts, and the executor admits that he has never sold it. So *184 far as it appears to the Court, therefore, there is enough personal property to pay the debts, and no reason is given .why the land should be substituted for the personal property* Indeed the bill is not framed upon that idea, but upon the idea that the personal property is exhausted, or, that it need not be' exhausted to enable the plaintiff to sell the land. 2. The will was proved and the plaintiff qualified as executor, in October 1861. It was his duty to convert the personal property into assets to pay debts as soon, as he could. He-had a sale in November 1861, on six months’ credit, the amount of which was $1,019, and another sale in April 1862, the-amount of which was $905. The amount of both sales was $1,924. With the proceeds of sales he paid off debts to the amount of $868, leaving in his hands $1,061. There was but one debt outstanding against the estate, and the amount of' that was about $500. Now why did he not pay off a debt of' $500, when he had assets to the amount of $1,061 ? The-reason which he assigns is, that the sale notes were paid in-. Confederate money, and that the creditor would not take it,. He does not say when he tendered it, and we suppose he must have been dilatory, because in May 1862, Confederate money was but little more below par than United States Treasury notes are now, and it is not to be supposed that a creditor would have refused it at that time. He gives no reason why the whole property was not sold at once; if there was no good reason, then he is to be held responsible, as if he had sold all at once. But even when the notes of the second sale fell due, in October 1862, Confederate money was not so far depreciated as not to be usually received in payment of debts. And in May 1862, $1,061 of Confederate money would have sold in the market for more than enough gold to pay the debt, and even in October 1862, it would have sold for nearly, if not quite enough. And yet the executor laid the money away, and, as he says, has it now on hand worthless. This was gross negligence, and the executor is chargeable with the value of" the Confederate money, at the time when he received it. And that, if not of itself enough to pay off the only outstanding, *185 debt, would have been, more than sufficient, we are to conclude,, if added to the value of personal property left to the widow and unsold. An executor will not be allowed to sell land to pay debts, when it appears that he has, or by reasonable diligence might have had, sufficient assets out of the personal property. The demurrer is allowed. Bill dismissed with, costs. Pee Curiam. ¡Decree accordingly.