Rabil v. . Fagan

Connor, J. Tbe facts alleged in tbe complaint and admitted in the answer of tbe defendants in this action, are as follows: 1. On 24 December, 1931, tbe Wayne National Bank of Goldsboro, N. C., closed its doors, and ceased to do business as a banking corporation. Thereafter, tbe defendant, Frank F. Fagan, was duly appointed by tbe Comptroller of tbe Currency as receiver of said bank and is now engaged in tbe performance of bis duties as such receiver. 2. On 10 March, 1930, one W. Ellis executed and delivered to tbe Wayne National Bank bis note for tbe sum of $7,500, and on said day also executed and delivered to tbe said bank a deed of trust to tbe defendant, Geo. K. Freeman, trustee, on a store building in tbe town of Farmville, Pitt County, North Carolina, by which tbe said note for $7,500 was secured. Tbe deed of trust was duly recorded in tbe office of tbe register of deeds of Pitt County. 3. Prior to tbe commencement of this action, tbe defendant, Geo. K. Freeman, trustee, at tbe request of tbe defendant, Frank F. Fagan, receiver of tbe Wayne National Bank, bad advertised tbe property conveyed to him by tbe said deed of trust, for sale, under the power of sale contained therein, on 30 June, 1932. 4. Prior to tbe commencement of this action, tbe plaintiff, B. D. Eabil, bad tendered to tbe defendants, in full payment of tbe amount due on tbe note for $7,500, secured by tbe said deed of trust, tbe sum of $2,942.82, with interest from 24 December, 1931, contending that as assignee of a mortgage executed by W. Ellis to A. G. Eabil, subsequent to tbe registration of tbe deed of trust, be bad tbe right to redeem tbe property conveyed by tbe deed of trust, by paying tbe full amount secured thereby. Tbe defendants refused to accept tbe amount tendered by plaintiff, contending that in addition to said amount, there was due tbe defendant, Frank F. Fagan, receiver, by W. Ellis tbe sum of $975.00, with interest from 12 January, 1931, which was also secured by tbe deed of trust. *226 It is alleged in the complaint that on 7 September, 1931, W. Ellis, executed and delivered to A. G. Rabil a mortgage on the property theretofore conveyed by the said W. Ellis to the defendant, Geo. K. Freeman, trustee, to secure the sum of $4,000; that thereafter, for value, the said A. G. Rabil transferred and assigned to the plaintiff, B. D. Rabil, the said mortgage, and that the plaintiff is now the holder and owner of the same. These allegations are denied in the answer. The facts alleged in the answer and admitted by the demurrer filed by the plaintiff, are as follows: 1. After the execution and delivery by W. Ellis to the Wayne National Bank of the note for $7,500, and of the deed of trust by which said note was secured, to wit: on 28 October, 1930, the said W. Ellis executed and delivered to the Wayne National Bank his note for $5,000, due and payable on 26 January, 1931; contemporaneously with the execution and delivery of the said note for $5,000, the said W. Ellis agreed with the said bank, that his note for $7,500, and the deed of trust securing the said note, should be held by the said bank as collateral security for the payment of his note for $5,000 and of any other liability of the said W. Ellis to the said bank, whether then due or to become due thereafter, or which might thereafter be contracted; this agreement was in writing and was set out in the face of the note for $5,000, which was signed by the said W. Ellis. 2. At the date of said agreement, to wit: 28 October, 1930, the said W. Ellis was liable to the Wayne National Bank on a note dated 21 February, 1930, executed by John F. Farfour, Georgiana J. Farfour and W. Ellis, and payable to the said Wayne National Bank. The amount due on said note at the commencement of this action was $975.00 with interest from 12 January, 1932. At the hearing of this action, the demurrer of the plaintiff was sustained, and it was ordered, considered and adjudged that the deed of trust executed by W. Ellis to the defendant, Geo. K. Freeman, trustee, and recorded in the office of the register of deeds of Pitt County, be canceled by the clerk of the Superior Court of said county, upon the payment to said clerk by the plaintiff of the sum of $2,942.82, with interest from 20 January, 1932, for the use of the defendant, Frank F. Fagan, receiver of the Wayne National Bank. The defendant, Frank F. Fagan, receiver, contends that there was error in the judgment and that the same should be reversed. This contention must be sustained for two reasons: 1. The allegation in the complaint that the plaintiff, B. D. Rabil, is the assignee of a mortgage executed by W. Ellis to A. O. Rabil, subsequent to the registration of the deed of trust from W. Ellis to the *227 defendant, Geo. K. Freeman, trustee, is denied in the answer. An issue is thereby raised on the pleadings, which must be submitted to and passed upon by the jury. The plaintiff is not entitled to redeem the property conveyed by the deed of trust, unless he is, as he alleges, the assignee of a mortgage on the said property, executed subsequent to the registration of the deed of trust. Dickerson v. Simmons, 141 N. C., 325, 53 S. E., 850. 2. On the facts alleged in the answer and admitted by the demurrer, the defendant, Frank F. Fagan, receiver, has a first lien on the property conveyed by the deed of trust from W. Ellis to the defendant, Geo. K.. Freeman, trustee, not only for the amount tendered to the defendants by the plaintiff, to wit: $2,942.82, with interest, but also for the sum of $975.00, with interest, this being the amount due on the note for $1,000, on which W. Ellis was liable to the bank, on 28 October, 1930. Neither the note for $7,500, nor the deed of trust securing the said note had been paid or canceled at the date the said note and deed of trust were deposited with the bank as collateral security. For this reason neither Saleeby v. Brown, 190 N. C., 138, 129 S. E., 124, nor Belton v. Bank, 186 N. C., 614, 120 S. E., 220, is applicable to the instant case. The note for $1,000, on which ~W. Ellis was liable to the bank, was payable direct to the bank, and not to a third person, from whom the bank purchased the note, as was the case in Newsome v. Bank, 169 N. C., 534, 86 S. E., 499. There is error in the judgment. The demurrer should have been overruled. The judgment on the facts appearing from the pleadings is Reversed.