Full text
Ellis' Adm'r v. Hetfield. &8212 1 Mart., 41.
This was objected to by Slade, for the defendant: but And proof having given of the subscribing witness' handwriting:
WILLIAMS, J., required that the signature of the defendant should also be proved.
HAYWOOD, J., tacente.
It was accordingly done, and the plaintiff had a verdict.
NOTE. — See the note to Hamilton v. Williams, 2 N.C. 139, and the cases there referred to, and also the case of Saunders v. Ferrill,23 N.C. 97.
Cited: Ballard v. Ballard, 75 N.C. 192.
(72)