In Re Will of Lowrance

CoNNOR, J. Mrs. S. A. Lowrance died in Mooresville, N. 0., on 7 July, 1928. She bad lived in Mooresville for many years, and at her death was eighty years of age. She bad been a widow since 1925 and bad no children. After the death of her husband, Mr. and Mrs. J. B. Houston looked after her. Neither Mr. nor Mrs. Houston was related to her by blood or marriage. They lived next door to Mrs. Lowrance, and the evidence tended to show that the relationship between Mrs. Low-rance and Mrs. Houston was close and intimate. Mrs. Lowrance- constantly called on Mrs. Houston for companionship, and relied on her almost daily. Mrs. Houston saw Mrs. Lowrance practically every day, and responded to every call made on her by Mrs. Lowrance. During the latter’s illness, which has been almost continuous since her husband’s death, Mrs. Houston was at all times attentive to her. Mrs. Houston, named therein as “Marne Houston,” is the propounder of the paper-writing offered in this proceeding for probate as the last will and testament of Mrs. Lowrance. E. G-. Thomas is a nephew of Mrs. S. A. Lowrance and as such is one of her heirs at law. He resides in the State of Florida, but had been in Mooresville for four or five days preceding the death of Mrs. Lowrance. A few days before her death, he was notified of her illness' by Mrs. Houston, and in response to such notice, came to Mooresville and remained there until the death of Mrs. Lowrance. He is the caveator in this proceeding. After the death of Mrs. Lowrance, an envelope, on which were written in the handwriting of Mrs. Lowrance the words “My Will,” was found in the drawer of a roll-top desk in her house. This desk had been used by Mr. Lowrance, and after his death, by Mrs. Lowrance. The drawer in' which the envelope was found, contained valuable papers of Mrs. Lowrance. When the -envelope was opened, two sheets of paper were found therein. They were folded together, but were not attached, the one to the other. Both Mrs. Houston and Mr. Thomas were present when the envelope was found, and when it was opened. The two sheets of paper, with the writing thereon, found in the envelope, were propounded by Mrs. Houston as the last will and testament of Mrs. S. A. Lowrance. The words appearing on the first sheet of paper, marked Exhibit 0, are as follows: “Will of Mrs. (S. A. Lowrance) made 2 March, 1928. (West Center Avenue.) *784 Will begin in my room — I want Oni Hotiston to have my oak suit, and our clock, everything except my little dest. Want Julia Saser to have it, all the pictures she wants.” The words appearing on the second sheet of paper, marked Exhibit B, are as follows: “(Mooresville, N. C.) 1928 (192....). I will leave Marne Houston and her heirs all I have and house on Center Street. Mes. S. A. LowraNce.” The words appearing above in parentheses, to wit, on the first sheet, “S. A. Lowrance,” and “west Center Avenue,” and on the second sheet, “Mooresville, N. C.,” and “192 . ” are printed; all the other words on both sheets are written. The evidence shows that the sheets of paper with the words “S. A. Lowrance,” “west Center Avenue,” and “Moores-ville, N. 0.192. .,” were letter-heads owned by the deceased husband of Mrs. S. A. Lowrance. The propounder offered three witnesses, each of whom testified that he knew the handwriting of Mrs. S. A. Lowrance, and that he verily believed that all the words on said two sheets of paper, in writing, are in her handwriting. By his assignments of error based on his exceptions to the refusal of the court to give certain instructions to the jury as requested by him in apt time, and also to certain instructions as given by the court to the jury, in the charge, the caveator presents to this Court his contention that the paper-writing, consisting of the two sheets of paper offered in evidence by the propounder, and propounded for probate as the holograph will of Mrs. S. A. -Lowrance, deceased, is not her will, for that as shown by all the evidence, all the words appearing on said two sheets of paper are not in her handwriting. The statute in this State provides that a paper-writing, sufficient in form to constitute a last will and testament, must be probated as the holograph will of a deceased person, (1) where such paper-writing was found, after the death of such person, among his valuable papers and effects, and (2) where such paper-writing is in the handwriting of the deceased person whose will it purports to be, with the name of such person subscribed thereto, or inserted in some part thereof, provided such handwriting shall be proved by three credible witnesses, who state, under oath, that they verily believe that the paper-writing and every part thereof is in the handwriting of the deceased person, whose will it appears to be. Such paper-writing, when duly probated, as required by statute, is sufficient, as a holograph will, to give and convey both real and personal property. O. S., 4131, and C. S., 4144, sec. 2. *785 In Alexander v. Johnston, 171 N. C., 468, 88 S. E., 785, it is said by Allen, J.: “Tbe purpose of the statute is to enable persons wbo cannot procure the assistance of others in the preparation of a will, or who are not inclined to make known prior to death what disposition has been made of their property, to execute a valid will by a paper in their own handwriting and without the formal attestation of witnesses, and the formalities as to execution are intended to effectuate this purpose and not to defeat it. The paper must be found after death among- the valuable papers of the deceased, or deposited with some person for safe-keeping. This is to furnish evidence that the deceased person attached importance to the paper as a testamentary disposition, and to lessen opportunity for fraud or imposition. The paper must be in the handwriting of the deceased. This is to identify the testator, and to form the causal connection between the writer and the writing and to prevent the possibility of change and alterations without the consent of the testator. The name of the testator must be subscribed to the paper or inserted in some part thereof, and this is also for identification of the testator, and to furnish evidence of the paper being a completed instrument.” In re Jenkins’ Will, 157 N. C., 429, 72 S. E., 1072, it is said by Walker, J.: “The provisions of the statute are, of course, mandatory and not directory, and therefore there must be a strict compliance with them, before there can be a valid execution and probate of a holograph script as a will; but this does not mean that the construction of the statute should be so rigid and binding as to defeat its clearly expressed purpose. It must be construed and enforced strictly, but at the same time reasonably.” , Upon these well settled principles, the contention of the caveator in the instant ease cannot be sustained. When all the words appearing on a paper in the handwriting of the deceased person are sufficient, as in the instant case, to constitute a last will and testament, the mere fact that other words appear thereon, not in such handwriting, but not essential to the meaning of the words in such handwriting, cannot be held to defeat the intention of the deceased, otherwise clearly expressed, that such paper-writing is and shall be his last will and testament. There is no statutory requirement in this State that the holograph script shall be dated or shall show the place where it was executed by the testator. The words in print appearing on the sheets of paper propounded in the instant case are surplusage. They are not essential to the meaning of the words shown by three credible witnesses to be in the handwriting of Mrs. S. A. Lowrance. These words, without the printed words, are sufficient to constitute a testamentary disposition of property, both real and personal. The cases from other jurisdictions, cited and relied on by the caveator, do not, in view of differences in statutory requirements, control in the *786 instant case. There was no error in the trial in the Superior Court. The refusal of instructions as requested by the caveator, and the instructions given by the learned judge who presided at the trial, are well supported by the statutes in this State, and by authoritative decisions of this Court. The printed words were properly eliminated by the verdict and by the judgment, and only the words on the two sheets of paper, in the handwriting of Mrs. S. A. Lowrance, were probated as expressing her last will as to the disposition of her property, after her death. The judgment is affirmed. No error.