State v. . Collins

Ashe, J. (after stating the facts). There is no error. If his-Honor committed an error in admitting the declaration of Jones,, it was remedied by his withdrawing it from the jury, and excluding it from their consideration. The case of McAllister v. McAllister, 12 Ired., 184, settles this point. There the error alleged was in receiving the register’s book in evidence, instead of a certified copy of the registry. Ruffin, C. J., said: “If there had been error in admitting the register’s book, the defendant would *567 have no cause of complaint, for the .evidence was clearly and promptly withdrawn from the jury as irrelevant, and the defendant suffered no prejudice from it. It is undoubtedly proper and in the power of the Court, to correct a slip, by withdrawing improper evidence from the consideration of the jury, or by giving such explanations of an error as will prevent it from misleading a jury” — and the same learned Judge, in the case of State v. May, 4 Dev., 328, said: “If improper evidence be received, it may afterwards be pronounced incompetent, and the jury instructed not to receive it.” To the same effect is State v. Davis, 4 Dev., 612. The improper evidence in this case was promptly withdrawn from the consideration of the jury before the case was submitted to them. There is, therefore, no error. Let this be cenified to the Criminal Court of New Hanover county, that the case may be proceeded with according to lawn No error. Affirmed.