Young v. . McDonald

Per Curiam. This is an action brought by E. F. Young, receiver of Bank of Coats, who held a second lien on the land in controversy, to restrain the defendants, Chickamauga Trust Company, trustee, and Prudential Insurance Company, of America, from selling under its first lien. The answer of said defendants, Chickamauga Trust Company, trustee, and Prudential Insurance Company of America, set up *811 tbe plea of res judicata, that defendant, A. A. McDonald and wife, Mary Eeade McDonald, the makers of both liens, had theretofore brought an action to restrain defendant, Chickamauga Trust Company, trustee, from selling, “alleging as a basis of said action that there was no delinquent installments of principal and interest due on said note and upon the pleadings and affidavits in said action, Judge N. A. Sinclair found as a fact that the said installments were delinquent and ordered the restraining order issued in that action dissolved. The said A. A. McDonald appealed to the Supreme Court from said judgment, but never perfected said appeal, and it was dismissed under Supreme Court Eule 10, and judgment certified down to the clerk of the Superior Court of Harnett County. These defendants say that the allegations contained in paragraph 9 of the complaint in this action involve a question which is res judicata and ask that the pleadings, affidavits and judgments rendered in the action brought by A. A. McDonald and wife, Mary Eeade McDonald, against these defendants be considered a part of this answer by reference thereto as fully as if set out herein.” The above matter of res judicata], the affidavit of defendant, A. A. McDonald, and the affidavit of M. M. Elliott, president of the defendant, Chickamauga Trust Company, trustee, were all in evidence in the court below. The court below rendered the following judgment: “This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned judge of the Superior Court, and being heard upon the pleadings and affidavits of plaintiffs and defendants : It is hereupon ordered and adjudged that the restraining order heretofore issued in this ease be, and the same is hereby dissolved, the court having found as a fact that the deed of trust from A. A. McDonald and wife to the Chickamauga Trust Company, trustee, is a prior lien to that of the Bank of Coats, and the said defendants are hereby permitted to proceed to foreclose their deed of trust.” The judgment of the court below is affirmed on authority of Roebuck v. Carson, 197 N. C., 492. Affirmed.