Full text
H. T. GRAY Et Al. v. W. C. WORTHINGTON Et Al.
Stacy, C. J.
The nonsuit is correct on two grounds: First, it appears that the alleged parol agreement is in conflict with the written contract to convey (Ins. Co. v. Morehead, ante, 174) ; and, second, the contract to convey is not enforceable as against purchasers for value who hold prior registered title. C. S., 3309; Combes v. Adams, 150 N. C., 64, 63 S. E., 186; Hood, Comr., v. Macclesfield Co., ante, 280.
This is the only question presented by the appeal.
Affirmed.
Devin, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.