State v. . Ogleston

PER OuRIam. The evidence is, in our opinion, fully sufficient to support-the verdict. It tends to prove that the sheriff of Lenoir County, with two deputies, found a still in the woods a mile behind the houses where the'defendants lived; that the still was in active operation with a fire under the furnace and the spirits running from the spout of the still into a bucket; that Ogleston, who admitted that he had before that time engaged in the manufacture of spirituous liquors, was standing in front of the fire with his back to the still, and that Perry was sitting-down; that each of the defendants had a gun and that the two guns were wrapped up together and were near the defendants, and that no ■ one else was at or about the still. As the still was in active operation and as the defendants were the ■ only persons present the inference was at least permissible that the defendants were in charge of the still and operating it. The charge of his Honor is sustained by S. v. Horner, 174 N. C., *543 792, in which the Court says: “It makes no difference whether defendant was a principal in the first degree or in the second degree as an aider and abettor. The latter is but a lower grade of the principal ■offense, “viz, the distilling or manufacturing of the liquor. An aider and abettor is denominated in the books as a principal in the second ■degree.” No error.