Full text
UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gobel MATTINGLY, Et Al., Defendants; Eugene E. MORRIS, Etc., Plaintiffs, v. Gobel MATTINGLY, Et Al., Defendants. Bruce W. Christ, Respondent-Appellant

Loading…
Opinion
663 F.2d 68 · Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · Aug 12, 1980
Full text
UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gobel MATTINGLY, Et Al., Defendants; Eugene E. MORRIS, Etc., Plaintiffs, v. Gobel MATTINGLY, Et Al., Defendants. Bruce W. Christ, Respondent-Appellant
D. Utah · Nov 18, 2021
D. Colorado · Apr 21, 2017
D. Colorado · Jun 21, 2011
D. Wyoming · Nov 4, 2003
D. Kansas · Jul 5, 1994
Tenth Circuit · Apr 22, 1992
S.D. Florida · Oct 15, 1985
D.C. Circuit · Dec 28, 1984
D. Colorado · Mar 3, 1983
Parentheticals
holding that “the District Court erred in enforcing the subpoena [of a private company against a non-party federal employee]” because such an issue was “controlled by [Touhy] and Saunders v. The Great Western Sugar Company, 396 F.2d 794, (10th Cir. 1968)”
Aero Tech, Inc. v. Great American Insurance Company, an Ohio Corporation
reversing district court’s decision to enforce a subpoena