Loading…

Walcutt v. Huling — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Walcutt v. Huling

92 Ohio St. 518 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 6, 1915

Full text

Walcutt v. Huling

Judgment Affirmed. NICHOLS, C.J., JOHNSON, DONAHUE, NEWMAN and MATTHIAS, JJ., concur. *Page 240

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Not listed
Cluster ID: 4028350

Citations

92 Ohio St. 518

Cited by

Slater v. Ohio Dep't of Rehab. & Corr.
Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 17, 2018
Galloway v. Galloway
Ohio Court of Appeals · Jan 12, 2017
Berrum v. Georgetta
Nevada Supreme Court · Sep 5, 1939

Parentheticals

although no express agreement existed regarding fees or that the attorney would have a lien against the judgment, the amount of recovery was based on quantum meruit
Galloway v. Galloway

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service