Full text
LOWDEN Et Al. v. EXCISE BOARD OF PITTSBURG COUNTY
PER CURIAM.
This petition in error with transcript attached was filed April 12, 1934, to review a decision of the Court of Tax Review.
On the 2nd day of October, 1934, there was filed on behalf of all of the parties to the proceedings a stipulation in which it is agreed that pending this action an opinion of this court in the case of Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Excise Board of Washington County, 168 Okla. 619, 35 P. (2d) 274, determined all of the issues involved in this proceeding.
The stipulation sets out in what respects it is agreed that the judgment be reversed and in what respects affirmed as follows:
“As to assignment of error No. 2, involving item 3 of the protest, involving the crippled children fund of Pittsburg county, the judgment of the trial court Should be affirmed following- the decision of said court in the case of Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. Excise Board of Stephens County (168 Okla. 519, 34 P. (2d) 274).
“As to assignment of error No. 3, involving item 5 of the protest, involving the farm and home demonstrator fund of Pitts-burg county, the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed following the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of the Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. Excise Board of Stephens County (168 Okla. 519, 34 P. (2d) 274.
“As to assignments of error numbered 4 to 20, inclusive, involving the general fund of the respective school districts mentioned in said assignment of error, it is stipulated and agreed that the judgment of the trial court should be reversed and the trial court *182 directed to render judgment sustaining said items of protest, and each of them, the questions of law involved in these assignments of error having been fully settled and determined by this court in cause No. 25208, entitled School District No. 33, Choctaw County, Oklahoma, v. A. W. Trice et al., opinion filed February 16, 1934, and petition for rehearing having been later denied and said opinion having become final.” (168 Okla. 344, 32 P. (2d) 906).
The proceedings are therefore reversed and remanded, with directions to the Court of Tax Review to enter judgment in accordance with said stipulation.