Clinton Okla. Western R. R. Co. v. Smith

Opinion by DICKSON, O. The- parties' will be referred" to as plaintiff and defendants, as they were designated in the trial court. The plaintiff, O. D. Smith, commenced this action in the district court of Oklahoma county against the Chicago, Rock Island & *76 Pacific Railway Company and tlie Clinton & Oklahoma Western Railroad Company, for damages alleged to have been sustained by the plaintiff: by reason of the .delay in the delivery of a carload of cattle, and for damages for the rough handling of said cattle shipped from McClure, Okla., to Oklahoma City, Okla. The plaintiff alleged that he delivered said carload of cattle to the defendant. Clinton & Oklahoma Western Railroad Company at its station at McClure, Okla., on the 18th day of September, 1922; that the distance from McClure to Oklahoma City is about 124 miles, and that said shipment should have reached Oklahoma City in time for the market of September 19 1922, but that the defendant negligently and carelessly delayed said shipment at various points, and that said car did not reach Oklahoma City until the 20th of September, 1922, and that by reason of such delay his cattle were caused to shrink and were in a gaunted and famished condition and shrunken in weight, and that the market declined 50 cents per 100 weigh*' from 19th day of September to the 20th day of September, and further alleged that said shipment was handled by the defendants in a rough and unusual manner, and that the car was kicked and bumped and by reason whereo." his said cattle were scarred, skinned, and bruised, and presented a bad appearance when placed upon the market, all to his damage in the sum of $150.60. The defendants by separate answers put in issue the allegations of the plaintiff’s petition. The facts developed on the trial were that the defendant Clinton & Oklahoma Western Railroad Company operated a 'line of railroad over which one freight train ran each 24 hours, making connection with the Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Company’s station at Ralph Junction, a distance of about 27 miles from McClure, where said cattle were loaded. This train was scheduled to pass McClure at 3 o’clock p. m., and to make connection with the Chicago. Rock Island & Pacific Railway Company’s train at Ralph Junction at 4:20 o’clock p. m. The evidence on the part of the plaintiff is that he delivered his cattle at McClure at 4:30 o’clock p. m. on the 18th day of September. 1922. The train was late, and at about C o’clock p. m. of that day picked up said car at McClure and transferred it to Ralph Junction. The cattle were not delivered at. McClure until after the eastbound train of the Chicago. Rock Island & Pacific Railway Company was scheduled to pass Ralph Junction. It will be seen that the plaintiff, according to his own testimony, could not have expected to make connection at Ralph Junction with the Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Company’s train, so as to have reached Oklahoma City in time for the market of the following day. The testimony is undisputed that the Clinton & Oklahoma Western Railroad Company transported said carload of cattle from McClure to Ralph Junction, reaching there after the Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Company’s train had left, and that the cattle were unloaded and fed in the usual manner and reloaded and transferred to the Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Company, and shipped on the next freight train bound ior Oklahoma City, and reached Oklahoma City for the market of September 20, 1922. It appears that some of the cattle were slightly skinned and bruised at the time they were unloaded at Oklahoma City. There was no evidence tending to show rough or negligent handling of the shipment* by either of the carriers. The defendant Clinton & Oklahoma Western Railroad Company demurred to the evidence, which was-overruled, and the case was submitted to the jury, and a verdict rendered against both defendants for $25, for damages for thorough handling of this shipment, and against the defendant Clinton & Oklahoma Western Railroad Company in the sum o': $64.86 on account of loss in weight and shrinkage and feed bill, and the defendant Clinton & Oklahoma Western Railroad Company has appealed to this court and assigns that: (1) The court erred in overruling its demurrer to the evidence. (2) In overruling the motion of the defendant for an instructed verdict at the close of the case. 13) In overruling its motion for a new trial. , There is no theory upon which the judgment against the Clinton & Oklahoma Western Railroad Company can be sustained. The plaintiff in this case knew the schedule-of both carriers, and knew at the time he-delivered his cattle to the defendant at 4:30' o’clock p. m. on September 18. 1922, that he-could not make connection with the Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Company’s train at Ralph Junction. The undisputed evidence is that the shipment reached Oklahoma City at the earliest time it could reach that point a'ter the-stock were delivered for shipment. It is-true that the train of this defendant was late in passing through McClure, its regular-schedule being 3 o’clock p. m. and the train-passed through there on this day at about 6 o’clock p. m., but the plaintiff did not deliver the shipment to the carrier until 4:30* *77 o’clock p. m., and at a tim'e after the Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Company’s train was due and had passed Ralph Junction. There was no evidence tending to show unreasonable delay in the transportation of this shipment. C., R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Simmons, 100 Okla. 164, 228 Pac. 983; St. Louis & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Waggoner, 52 Okla. 1, 152 Pac. 448. The only evidence of negligence was the evidence that several of the cattle were slightly bruised and skinned in the shipment. The uncontradicted evidence is that the cattle were in good condition at the time they were delivered to the defendant at its station at McClure, and in good condition when reloaded by the defendant Clinton & Oklahoma Western Railroad Company, and delivered to the Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Company. The presumption, therefore, is that the injuries occurred on the line of the delivering carrier. St. Louis, I. M. & S. Ry. Co. v. Carlile, 35 Okla. 118, 128 Pac. 690; Wichita Falls & N. W. Ry. Co. v. Benton, 66 Okla. 114, 167 Pac. 633. The judgment appealed from is reversed and remanded, with directions to the trial court to further proceed in the case in conformity with the views herein expressed. By the Court: It is so ordered.