Full text
MILLER Et Al. v. WILLIAMS Et Al.
Opinion by
EOBERTSON, C.
This appeal was filed in this court June 8, 1911. Neither party has filed a brief, nor is there any excuse offered for their failure to do so. It is evident that the proceedings have been abandoned. The appeal should, therefore, be dismissed, for want of prosecution, *702 under rule 7 of this court (20 Okla. viii, 95 Pac. vi); Streeter v. McCoy, 34 Okla. 490, 126 Pac. 216; Streeter v. Huene, 34 Okla. 491, 126 Pac. 216; Thompson v. Murray, 34 Okla. 521, 125 Pac. 1133; Reliable Ins. Co. v. Newcomber, 34 Okla. 759, 127 Pac. 260; O. & G. Ry. Co. v. Johnson, 34 Okla. 816, 127 Pac. 422; First Nat. Bank v. Baldwin, 34 Okla. 825, 127 Pac. 260; Snow v. Frye, 34 Okla. 826, 127 Pac. 422.
By the Court: It is so ordered.
