Data v. Ghigo & Co.

PER CURIAM. Defendant has appealed from a judgment entered against her and on December 2, 1942, filed her brief. The authorities therein cited reasonably sustain the allegations of error. The defendant in error has filed no brief and has offered no excuse for such failure. Under the authority of Osborne v. Osborne, 163 Okla. 273, 21 P. 2d *446 1056, it is not the duty of this court to search the record for some theory upon ■which to sustain the action of the trial court. The cause is reversed and remanded, with directions to vacate the judgment for the plaintiff and enter judgment for the defendant. CORN, C. J., GIBSON, V. C. J., and RILEY, OSBORN, BAYLESS, WELCH, HURST, DAVISON, and ARNOLD, JJ., concur.