Opinion

Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Scott

1925 Okla. LEXIS 159 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 12, 1925

Full text

PER CURIAM. Upon the authority of Ellis v. Outler, 25 Okla. 469, 106 Pac. 957, this cause is reversed and remanded for new trial for failure of the defendant in error to file a brief as provided in rule 7 of this court.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: PER CURIAM.
Cluster ID: 4077716

Citations

1925 Okla. LEXIS 159
108 Okla. 268
236 P. 417
1925 OK 362

Cited by

City of Choctaw v. Jorco II, LLC
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Jun 26, 2008
Opinion No. (1991) Ag
Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 27, 1991
City of Tulsa v. Oklahoma State Pension & Retirement Board
Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 12, 1983
Sinclair Prairie Pipe Line Co. v. Excise Board of Tulsa County
Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 18, 1935
Protest of Kansas City Southern Ry. Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 26, 1932
State v. City of Tulsa
Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 1, 1931
Protest of Chicago R. I. & P. Ry. Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 8, 1931
Oklahoma Railway Co. v. Boyd