Loading…

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Welshire v. Bruaw

331 Pa. 392 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 26, 1938

Full text

Welshire v. Bruaw Et Al., Appellants

Per Curiam, We affirm the order on the excerpts from the opinion of the court below which appear in the Reporter’s Note. Order affirmed.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Kephart, Schaffer, Maxey, Drew, Linn, Stern, Barnes
Cluster ID: 4091082

Citations

331 Pa. 392
1938 Pa. LEXIS 708
200 A. 67

Cited by

Judge, L. & D. v. Wyoming Valley Health Care, etal
Superior Court of Pennsylvania · May 18, 2015
Craddock v. Viechnicki
Lehigh County Court of Common Pleas · Feb 3, 2006
Carter v. United States Steel Corp.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 6, 1992
Carter v. United States Steel Corp.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 4, 1990
John Keller v. George Petsock, Warden Attorney General of Commonwealth of Pennsylvania District Attorney, Allegheny County. Appeal of John Keller
Third Circuit · Aug 11, 1988
Commonwealth v. Williams
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 17, 1987
Commonwealth v. Fuller
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 14, 1984
Commonwealth v. Harter

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service

Clinton County Court of Common Pleas · Apr 24, 1981

Pittsburgh National Bank v. Mutual Life Insurance Co. of New York

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 4, 1981

Commonwealth v. Sero

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 28, 1978

Commonwealth v. Germond

Mercer County Court of Common Pleas · Sep 28, 1972

Polis v. Commonwealth

Beaver County Court of Common Pleas · Jun 28, 1972

Parentheticals

inherently coercive effect of tipstaff's conduct in pressuring jurors to reach a prompt decision on jury's deliberations warranted a new trial
Carter v. United States Steel Corp.
inherently coercive effect of tipstaffs conduct in pressuring jurors to reach a prompt decision on jury’s deliberations warranted a new trial
Carter v. United States Steel Corp.

Welshire v. Bruaw — freecase.ai