Myette v. Gross

Per Curiam. The-declaration in this case shows merely that the defendants negligently omitted sufficiently to shore up the roof of their mine, in consequence of which the plaintiff’s intestate was killed by the falling upon him of a mass of graphite. As the intestate was killed, no action for damages lies at common law. Pub. Stat. R. I. cap. 204, § 20, 1 provides an action in cases in which death ensues from injury inflicted by the wrongful act of another and in which an action for damages might have been maintained at common law had death not .ensued. But this statute does not extend to an action against a defendant who is charged with a mere passive neglect or omission of duty. Bradbury v. Furlong, 13 R. I. 15. *730 Albert D. Bean, for plaintiff. Raymond G. Mowry, for defendants. The verdict is set aside and the case remitted to. the Common Pleas Division with direction to dismiss, unless the plaintiff is able to amend his declaration so as to bring the case within the provision of the statute and, on motion, shall obtain leave for such amendment. Footnotes [1] As follows: Sue. 20. In all cases in which, the death of any person ensues from injury inflicted by the wrongful act of another, and in which an action for damages might have been maintained at the common law had death not ensued, the person inflicting such injury shall be liable to an action for damages for the injury caused by the death of such person, to be recovered by action of the case for the use of the' husband, widow, children or next of kin, in like manner and with like effect as in the preceding five sections provided.