Neely v. Love

144 S.C. 271 · Supreme Court of South Carolina · Mar 9, 1928

Full text

Neely v. Love Et Al.

Opinions in this case

Majority — Carter
Concurrence — Brease
Concurrence — Brease
Dissent — Coti
Dissent
Dissent — Cothran

Order Dismissing Petition For Rehearing 'The petition for a rehearing in this cause having been carefully considered, and, being satisfied that the Court has not overlooked any material fact or principle of law involved in the appeal, it is hereby ordered that petition be, and is hereby, dismissed. Eugene S. Brease, Jesse F. Carter, J. Wm. Thurmond, T. P. Cothran : I dissent.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author: Carter
Judges

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service

Coti-Iran, Thurmond, Brease, Carter, Cothran, Ti-Iurmond

Cluster ID

4115687

Citations

144 S.C. 271
1928 S.C. LEXIS 70
142 S.E. 623

Cited by

In re Checking Account Overdraft Litigation
S.D. Georgia · Apr 3, 2012
Hahn v. Smith
Supreme Court of South Carolina · Jul 10, 1930

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.