Full text
McLaughlin v. Zeigler.
Opinions in this case
- Majority — Per curiam
- Majority — Per curiam
- Concurrence — Woods
Per Curiam.
This was an application for a writ of certiorari addressed to the Court in the exercise of its original jurisdiction.
There are two reasons why the writ should be denied.
(1). Because there was no notice of pretest 1 served upon J. L. Zeigler the respondent, and
(2). Because there was a substantiál compliance 2 with the requirements of the Act.
Petition dismissed.
