Opinion

Ringer Ringer v. State

137 Tex. Crim. 242 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Dec 21, 1938

Full text

John Ringer and B. C. Ringer v. the State

Opinions in this case

Majority
Addendum

Appellants were convicted of a felony in Irion County, and are in this Court on an appeal therefrom. The appeal bond is defective in that it does not recite that appellants have been convicted of a felony. We have heretofore held in Ex parte Hagler, 28 S.W.2d 550: "It is essential, under the statute, that it be stated in the bond that the accused had been convicted of a felony. Articles 817 and 818, C. C. P.; Read v. State, 109 Tex.Crim. R.,4 S.W.2d 547." Also see Teel v. State, 91 S.W.2d 747, and cases there cited. This appeal will be dismissed, and appellants granted fifteen days from this date in which to file a proper appeal bond. Appeal dismissed. ON MOTION TO REINSTATE APPEAL.

Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist. · Apr 20, 2006

Kenneth E. Gibson v. State

Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist. · Aug 21, 2003

Curry v. Wilson

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Apr 7, 1993

Garber v. State

Tex. App. Ct., 8th Dist. (El Paso) · Feb 29, 1984

James v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia · Oct 27, 1981

Garcia v. Dial

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Apr 2, 1980

Poore v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 18, 1975

State v. Blue

New Jersey Superior Court App Division · Jun 4, 1974

Flores v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Nov 1, 1972

Suggs v. State

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · Mar 6, 1969

Salazar v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Oct 30, 1968

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.