Opinion

Harris v. State

149 Tex. Crim. 610 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Dec 11, 1946

Full text

G. E. Harris v. the State

Opinions in this case

DAVIDSON, Judge. This is a conviction for unlawfully possessing whisky for the purpose of sale in a dry area; the punishment, a fine of $500.00 and sixty days’ confinement in jail. There accompanies this record what is denominated a statement of facts. Same does not appear to have been filed in the trial court. By the provisions of Art. 760, C. C. P., the statement of facts must be filed in the trial court within ninety days from the date notice of appeal is given. *37 We are not authorized to consider the purported statement of facts here presented. In the absence of a statement of facts, we are unable to appraise the bills of exception. No reversible. error appearing, the judgment of the trial court court is affirmed. The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.

150 Tex. Crim. 36

1946 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 923

198 S.W.2d 459

198 S.W.2d 1020

Cited by

Justin Riordan v. State
Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin) · Aug 4, 2017
Dunavin v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jan 28, 1981
Brown v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Dec 15, 1965
Bennett v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Nov 24, 1965
Sessums v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Mar 21, 1951
Price v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Mar 29, 1950
Wideman v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · May 26, 1948
Sheffield v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Mar 12, 1947

Parentheticals

“It appears from the record before us that the trial court in [its] charge failed to instruct the jury that every defendant in a criminal case is presumed to be innocent until his guilt is established beyond a reasonable doubt.”
Justin Riordan v. State